Razer Huntsman V2 Analog vs Leopold FC900R

Detailed comparison of Razer Huntsman V2 Analog, Leopold FC900R. Compare features, specifications, and performance to find the perfect keyboard for your needs.

Razer Huntsman V2 Analog

Razer Huntsman V2 Analog

Performance & Build

Specifications

Mechanical Switches
Anti-Ghosting
Media Keys
Programmable Keys
Customizable Macros
Custom Key Mapping
Profile Switching
Onboard Memory
Bluetooth
Rechargeable Battery
Detachable Cable
Usb Passthrough
Backlight
RGB Lighting
Per-Key Lighting
Layer Indicator Lights
OLED Display
Height Adjustment Feet
Wrist Rest
Swappable Keycaps
Volume Wheel
Water Resistant
Numpad

Technical Details

Technical Specs

typeWired
compactnessFull-sized
switchesRazer Analog Optical
keycap materialPBT
switch lifespan80 million actuations
polling rate1000 Hz
actuation point1.5mm
response time1ms

Build Quality

Build Details

Frame MaterialPlastic
DurabilityN/A
Material DetailsAluminum top plate and matte finish

Ergonomics

Ergonomic Features

Noise LevelLinear
Wrist SupportDetachable
AnglesAdjustable
Leopold FC900R

Leopold FC900R

Performance & Build

Specifications

Mechanical Switches
Anti-Ghosting
Media Keys
Programmable Keys
Customizable Macros
Custom Key Mapping
Profile Switching
Onboard Memory
Bluetooth
Rechargeable Battery
Detachable Cable
Usb Passthrough
Backlight
RGB Lighting
Per-Key Lighting
Layer Indicator Lights
OLED Display
Height Adjustment Feet
Wrist Rest
Swappable Keycaps
Volume Wheel
Water Resistant
Numpad

Technical Details

Technical Specs

typeWired
compactnessFull-sized
switchesCHERRY MX BLUE
keycap materialPBT
switch lifespan50 million actuations
polling rate1000 Hz
actuation point2.2 mm
response time1 ms

Build Quality

Build Details

Frame MaterialPlastic
DurabilityNot water resistant
Material DetailsSturdy plastic casing

Ergonomics

Ergonomic Features

Noise LevelClicky
Wrist SupportNone
AnglesFixed angle

Tuomas Jokela

Keyboard Enthusiast & Developer